From S'pore LGBT encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Within Christianity there are a variety of views on the issues of sexual orientation and homosexuality. The many Christian denominations vary in their position, from condemning homosexual acts as sinful, through being divided on the issue, to seeing it as morally acceptable. Even within a denomination, individuals and groups may hold different views. Further, not all members of a denomination necessarily support their church's views on homosexuality.

In the twentieth and twenty-first centuries the extent to which the Bible mentions the subject – and whether or not it is condemned – has become the subject of debate. This debate concerns, at the very least, the proper interpretation of the Levitical code; the story of Sodom and Gomorrah; and various Pauline passages, and whether these verses condemn same-sex sexual activities.

Scriptural views[edit]


The Bible refers to sexual practices that may be called "homosexual" in today's world, but the original language texts of the Bible do not refer explicitly to homosexuality as a sexual orientation. For example, passages in the Old Testament book Leviticus prohibit "lying with mankind as with womankind" and the story of Sodom and Gomorrah (Genesis 19) has been interpreted by some as condemning homosexual practice.

File:John Martin - Sodom and Gomorrah.jpg
The Destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, John Martin, 1852.

The story of the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah does not explicitly identify homosexuality as the sin for which they were destroyed. Most interpreters find this story and a similar one in Judges 19 to condemn the violent rape of guests, rather than homosexuality,[1] but the passage has historically been interpreted within Judaism and Christianity as a punishment for homosexuality due to the interpretation that the men of Sodom wished to rape the angels who retrieved Lot.

The New Testament refers to "sexual immorality" on multiple occasions including Matthew 15:19, Mark 7:21, Acts 15:20 and 29, and many more. The definition of "sexual immorality" is disputed among scholars, but it is often included in lists along with adultery (e.g. Matthew 15:19) indicating it is much more than just adultery. Many scholars believe that everything in Leviticus referring to immoral "sexual relations" would be included in the New Testament's "sexual immorality". As such, homosexuality would be included in all of these passages which condemn sexual immorality. The Apostle Paul's warning against unnatural sexual practices is recorded in chapter 1 of the epistle to the Romans with the passage Romans 1:26-27 in particular being most often cited as evidence of condemnation of homosexuality within the New Testament.

Other interpreters, however, maintain that the Bible does not condemn homosexuality, arguing any of several points: (i) that the passages yield different meanings if placed in historical context, for instance the historical interpretation of Sodom's sins as being other than homosexuality; (ii) there may be questions surrounding the translation of rare or unusual words in the passages that some interpret as referring to homosexuals; (iii) both the Old Testament and New Testament contain passages that describe same-sex relationships; and/or (iv) that loving and committed relationships are not condemned in the passages.[2] All of these assertions are disputed by other scholars, however.

Christian denominational positions[edit]

Template:Main Template:Globalize Denominations that oppose homosexuality include the Eastern Orthodox Church,[3] the churches of Oriental Orthodoxy[4] and some mainline Protestant denominations, such as the Methodist churches,[5][6][7][8] Reformed Church in America[9] the American Baptist Church,[10] as well as Conservative Evangelical organizations and churches, such as the Evangelical Alliance,[11] the Presbyterian Church in America[12] and the Southern Baptist Convention.[13][14][15] Many Pentecostal churches such as the Assemblies of God,[16] as well as Restorationist churches, like Jehovah's Witnesses and LDS Church, also take the position that homosexual activity is immoral.[17][18]

The Catholic Church states that "homosexual tendencies" are "objectively disordered", but does not consider them sinful per se.[19][20] The Church, however, considers "homosexual acts" to be "grave sins", "intrinsically disordered", and "contrary to the natural law", and "under no circumstances can they be approved".[20][21] The Eastern Orthodox churches,[22] like the Catholic Church, condemns only homosexual acts. All Orthodox jurisdictions, such as the Orthodox Church in America, have taken the approach of welcoming people with "homosexual feelings and emotions," while encouraging them to work towards "overcoming its harmful effects in their lives," and not allowing the sacraments to people who seek to justify homosexual activity.[23] The Catholic Church views as sinful any sexual act not related to procreation by couple joined under the Sacrament of Matrimony.[24][25]

Other Christian denominations do not view monogamous same-sex relationships as sinful or immoral, and may bless such unions and consider them marriages. These include the United Church of Canada, and the United Church of Christ.,[26] all German Lutheran, reformed and united churches in EKD,[27] all Swiss reformed churches, the Protestant Church in the Netherlands, the Church of Denmark, the Church of Sweden, the Church of Iceland and the Church of Norway. The Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland also allows prayer for same-sex couples.[28] In particular, the Metropolitan Community Church was founded specifically to serve the Christian LGBT community. The Global Alliance of Affirming Apostolic Pentecostals (GAAAP), traces its roots back to 1980, making it the oldest LGBT-affirming Apostolic Pentecostal denomination in existence.[29] Another such organization is the Affirming Pentecostal Church International, currently the largest affirming Pentecostal organization, with churches in the US, UK, Central and South America, Europe and Africa.

Some denominations state opposing positions. Various churches within the Lutheran World Federation hold stances on the issue ranging from declaring homosexual acts as sin to acceptance of homosexual relationships. For example, the Lutheran Church–Missouri Synod, the Lutheran Church of Australia, and the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod recognize homosexual behavior as intrinsically sinful and seek to minister to those who are struggling with homosexual inclinations.[30][31] However, the Church of Sweden conducts same-sex marriages, while the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America opens the ministry of the church to gay pastors and other professional workers living in committed relationships.[32] The Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) is also much like Lutheranism in regards to homosexuality. For example, the Friends United Meeting and the Evangelical Friends International believe that sexual relations are condoned only in marriage, which they define to be between a man and a woman.[33] However, the Friends General Conference and the Friends in Great Britain approve of same-sex marriage.[34][35] Most of the Anglican Communion does not approve of homosexual activity, with the exception of the Episcopal Church, which is facing a possible exclusion from international Anglican bodies over the issue.[36]

LGBT-affirming denominations regard homosexuality as a natural occurrence. The United Church of Christ celebrates gay marriage,[37] and some parts of the Anglican[38] and Lutheran[30] churches allow for the blessing of gay unions. The United Church of Canada also allows same-sex marriage, and views sexual orientation as a gift from God. Within the Anglican communion there are openly gay clergy, for example, Gene Robinson is an openly gay Bishop in the US Episcopal Church. Within the Lutheran communion there are openly gay clergy, for example, bishop Eva Brunne is an openly lesbian Bishop in the Church of Sweden. Such religious groups and denominations interpretation of scripture and doctrine leads them to accept that homosexuality is morally acceptable, and a natural occurrence. For example, in 1988 the United Church of Canada, that country's largest Protestant denomination, affirmed that "a) All persons, regardless of their sexual orientation, who profess Jesus Christ and obedience to Him, are welcome to be or become full member of the Church; and b) All members of the Church are eligible to be considered for the Ordered Ministry."[39] In 2000, the Church's General Assembly further affirmed that "human sexual orientations, whether heterosexual or homosexual, are a gift from God and part of the marvelous diversity of creation."[40]

In addition, some Christian denominations such as the Moravian Church, believe that the Holy Bible speaks negatively of homosexual acts but, as research on the matter continues, the Moravian Church seeks to establish a policy for ordination and homosexuality.[41]

Critical views[edit]


File:Sodoma - Aldegrever.jpg
Lot prevents sodomites from raping the angels, Heinrich Aldegrever, 1555.
File:2006 protesters at union square.jpg
Christian protesters at a 2006 gay pride event in San Francisco.

Most American members of the Christian Right consider homosexual acts as sinful[42] and think they should not be accepted by society.[43] They tend to interpret biblical verses on homosexual acts to mean that the heterosexual family was created by God[44] and that same-sex relationships contradict God’s design for marriage and violate his will.[45][46][47][48][49] Christians who oppose homosexual relationships sometimes contend that same-gender sexual activity is unnatural.[50]

Christian objections to homosexual behavior are often based upon their interpretations of the Bible. Some Christians believe that the book of Leviticus contains prohibitions against homosexuality.[51][52][53][54] Some Biblical scholars interpret Template:Bibleverse as indicating that homosexual activity led to the destruction of the ancient cities of Sodom and Gomorrah.[51][55] Other Biblical passages that some interpret as addressing the issue of homosexual behavior include Template:Bibleverse, Template:Bibleverse, and Template:Bibleverse.[51] Christian author and counselor Joe Dallas says that the Biblical passages relating to homosexual acts uniformly prohibit that behavior.[56] Exodus International and others take the view that Template:Bibleverse offers Christian believers "freedom from homosexuality,"[57]Template:Dead link[58] although Exodus has since ceased activities in June 2013, issuing a statement which repudiated its aims and apologized for the harm their pursuit has caused to LGBT people.[59]

The Catechism of the Catholic Church states "men and women who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies ... must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity."[60] Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided." They oppose criminal penalties against homosexuality.[61] The Catholic Church requires those who are attracted to people of the same (or opposite) sex to practice chastity, because it teaches that sexuality should only be practiced within marriage, which includes chaste sex as permanent, procreative, heterosexual, and monogamous. The Vatican distinguishes between "deep-seated homosexual tendencies" and the "expression of a transitory problem", in relation to ordination to the priesthood; saying in a 2005 document that homosexual tendencies "must be clearly overcome at least three years before ordination to the diaconate."[62] A 2011 report based on telephone surveys of American Catholics conducted by the Public Religion Research Institute found that 56% believe that sexual relations between two people of the same sex are not sinful.[63][64]

Confessional Lutheran churches teach that it's sinful to have homosexual desires, even if they don't lead to homosexual activity.[65] The Doctrinal statement issued by the Wisconsin Synod states that making a distinction between homosexual orientation and the act of homosexuality is confusing: Template:Quote However, confessional Lutherans also warn against selective morality which harshly condemns homosexuality while treating other sins more lightly.[66]

In opposing interpretations of the Bible that are supportive of homosexual relationships, conservative Christians have argued for the reliability of the Bible,[67][68] and the meaning of texts related to homosexual acts,[47][69] while often seeing what they call the diminishing of the authority of the Bible by many homosexual authors as being ideologically driven.[70]

As an alternative to a school-sponsored Day of Silence opposing bullying of LGBT students, conservative Christians organized a Golden Rule Initiative, where they passed out cards saying "As a follower of Christ, I believe that all people are created in the image of God and therefore deserve love and respect."[71] Others created a Day of Dialogue to oppose what they believe is the "silencing" of Christian students who make public their opposition to homosexuality.

Favorable views[edit]

In the 20th century, theologians like Jürgen Moltmann, Hans Küng, John Robinson, Bishop David Jenkins, Don Cupitt, Bishop Jack Spong and Matthew Vines challenged traditional theological positions and understandings of the Bible; following these developments some have suggested that passages have been mistranslated or that they do not refer to what we understand as "homosexuality."[72] Clay Witt, a minister in the Metropolitan Community Church, explains how theologians and commentators like John Shelby Spong, George Edwards and Michael England interpret injunctions against certain sexual acts as being originally intended as a means of distinguishing religious worship between Abrahamic and the surrounding pagan faiths, within which homosexual acts featured as part of idolatrous religious practices: "England argues that these prohibitions should be seen as being directed against sexual practices of fertility cult worship. As with the earlier reference from Strong’s, he notes that the word 'abomination' used here is directly related to idolatry and idolatrous practices throughout the Hebrew Testament. Edwards makes a similar suggestion, observing that 'the context of the two prohibitions in Template:Bibleverse and Template:Bibleverse suggest that what is opposed is not same-sex activity outside the cult, as in the modern secular sense, but within the cult identified as Canaanite'".[73]

Some Christians believe that Biblical passages have been mistranslated or that these passages do not refer to LGBT orientation as currently understood.[74] Liberal Christian scholars, like conservative Christian scholars, accept earlier versions of the texts that make up the Bible in Hebrew or Greek. However, within these early texts there are many terms that modern scholars have interpreted differently from previous generations of scholars.[75][76][77] There are concerns with copying errors, forgery, and biases among the translators of later Bibles.[75][76][77] They consider some verses such as those they say support slavery[75] or the inferior treatment of women[76] as not being valid today, and against the will of God present in the context of the Bible. They cite these issues when arguing for a change in theological views on sexual relationships to what they say is an earlier view. They differentiate among various sexual practices, treating rape, prostitution, or temple sex rituals as immoral and those within committed relationships as positive regardless of sexual orientation. They view certain verses, which they believe refer only to homosexual rape, as not relevant to consensual homosexual relationships.[77]

Yale scholar John Boswell has argued that a number of Early Christians entered into homosexual relationships,[78] and that certain Biblical figures had homosexual relationships, such as Ruth and her mother-in-law Naomi, Daniel and the court official Ashpenaz, and David and King Saul's son Jonathan.[79] Boswell has also argued that adelphopoiesis, a rite bonding two men, was akin to a religiously sanctioned same-sex union. Having partaken in such a rite, a person was prohibited from entering into marriage or taking monastic vows, and the choreography of the service itself closely parallelled that of the marriage rite.[78][80][81] His views have not found wide acceptance, and opponents have argued that this rite sanctified a Platonic brotherly bond, not a homosexual union.[81] He also argued that condemnation of homosexuality began only in the 12th century.[82] CriticsTemplate:Who of Boswell have pointed out that many earlier doctrinal sources condemn homosexuality in ethical terms without prescribing a punishment, and that Boswell's citations reflected a general trend towards harsher penalties from the 12th century onwards.

Desmond Tutu, the former Anglican Archbishop of Cape Town and a Nobel Peace Prize winner, has described homophobia as a "crime against humanity" and "every bit as unjust" as apartheid:[83] "We struggled against apartheid in South Africa, supported by people the world over, because black people were being blamed and made to suffer for something we could do nothing about; our very skins. It is the same with sexual orientation. It is a given. ... We treat them [gays and lesbians] as pariahs and push them outside our communities. We make them doubt that they too are children of God – and this must be nearly the ultimate blasphemy. We blame them for what they are."[84]

Modern gay Christian leader Justin R. Cannon promotes what he calls "Inclusive Orthodoxy" (not to be confused with the Eastern Orthodox Church). He explains on his ministry website: "Inclusive Orthodoxy is the belief that the Church can and must be inclusive of LGBT individuals without sacrificing the Gospel and the Apostolic teachings of the Christian faith."[85] Cannon's ministry takes a unique approach quite distinct from modern liberal Christians, yet which still supports homosexual relations. His ministry affirms the divine inspiration of the Bible, the authority of Tradition, and says "...that there is a place within the full life and ministry of the Christian Church for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Christians, both those who are called to lifelong celibacy and those who are partnered."[86]

Homosexual Christians and organizations[edit]

Template:Further Template:See also

George Barna, a conservative Christian author and researcher, conducted a survey in the United States in 2009 that found gay and lesbian people having a Christian affiliation were more numerous than had been presumed. He characterized some of his leading conclusions from the data as follows:[87]

"People who portray gay adults as godless, hedonistic, Christian bashers are not working with the facts. A substantial majority of gays cite their faith as a central facet of their life, consider themselves to be Christian, and claim to have some type of meaningful personal commitment to Jesus Christ active in their life today. The data indicate that millions of gay people are interested in faith but not in the local church and do not appear to be focused on the traditional tools and traditions that represent the comfort zone of most churched Christians. Gay adults clearly have a different way of interpreting the Bible on a number of central theological matters, such as perspectives about God. Homosexuals appreciate their faith but they do not prioritize it, and they tend to consider faith to be individual and private rather than communal."

The study of 20 faith-oriented attributes revealed significant differences between the United States heterosexual and homosexual populations sampled, homosexual respondents being less likely to be born again Christians than heterosexual respondents (27% compared to 47%), and the degree of commitment to their faith and families also differed. Other significant contrasts were seen in regards to "liberal" versus "conservative" social positions, as well as in one’s understanding of God, with 43% of homosexual participants sharing the "orthodox, biblical" understanding of God which 71% of heterosexual participants indicate they do. Respondents were not asked to describe themselves as "born again", but as is standard in Barna studies, this classification was defined according to basic standard criteria.[88] Barna concluded, “The data indicates that millions of gay people are interested in faith but not in the local church and do not appear to be focused on the traditional tools and traditions that represent the comfort zone of most churched Christians." And that "Gay adults clearly have a different way of interpreting the Bible on a number of central theological matters, such as perspectives about God."[88]

Candace Chellew-Hodge, liberal Christian lesbian founder of online magazine Whoseoever, responded to the findings:

All in all, I'm grateful for Barna even wandering into the subject of gay and lesbian religious belief. I think his study is important and can go a long way to dispelling the old "gays vs. God" dichotomy that too often gets played out in the media. However, his overall message is still harmful: Gays and lesbians are Christians – they're just not as good as straight ones.[89]

She argued that Barna had formulated his report with undue irony and skepticism, and that he had failed to take into account the reasons for the data which enkindled his "arrière pensée." The reason why far fewer homosexuals attend church, she argued, is that there are far fewer churches who will accept them. Equally, gays and lesbians do not see the Bible as unequivocally true because they are forced by its use against them to read it more closely and with less credulity, leading them to note its myriad contradictions.[89]

Organizations for homosexual Christians exist across a wide range of beliefs and traditions. The interdenominational Gay Christian Network has some members who affirm same-sex relationships and others who commit themselves to celibacy, groups it refers to as "Side A" and "Side B", respectively.[90][91] According to founder Justin Lee,

"We're just trying to get people together who experience attraction to the same sex, however they have handled that, and who love Jesus and say, OK, you are welcome here, and then let's pray together and figure out where God wants us to take it."[92]

Some organizations cater exclusively to homosexual Christians who do not want to have gay sex, or attraction; the goals of these organizations vary. Some Christian groups focus on simply refraining from gay sex, such as Courage International and North Star.[93] Other groups additionally encourage gay members to reduce or eliminate same-sex attractions. Exodus International and the associated Love Won Out are examples of such ministries. These groups are sometimes referred to as ex-gay organizations, though many no longer use the term. Alan Chambers, the president of Exodus, says the term incorrectly implies a complete change in sexual orientation,[94] though the group Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays and Gays continues to use the term.

Gay Christian writer and actor Peterson Toscano argues that organizations promoting orientation change are a "ruse."[95] An organization he co-founded, Beyond Ex-Gay, supports people who feel they have been wounded by such organizations.[96]

Other groups support or advocate for gay Christians and their relationships. For example, in the United States, IntegrityUSA represents the interests of lesbian and gay Christians in the Episcopal Church,[97] while United Methodists have the Reconciling Ministries Network and evangelical Christians have Evangelicals Concerned.[98] In 2014 the United Church of Christ filed a lawsuit challenging North Carolina’s ban on same-sex marriage, which is America’s first faith-based challenge to same-sex marriage bans; the Alliance of Baptists joined the lawsuit later that year.[99][100]

In Europe, lesbian and gay evangelical Christians have a European forum.[101] Working within the worldwide Anglican Communion on a range of discrimination issues, including those of LGBT clergy and people in the church, is Inclusive Church.[102] The longest standing group for lesbian and gay Christians in the UK, founded in 1976, is the non-denominational Lesbian and Gay Christian Movement;[103] specifically aimed to meet the needs of lesbian and gay evangelicals, there is the Evangelical Fellowship for Lesbian and Gay Christians;[104] specifically working within the Church of England is Changing Attitude,[105] which also takes an international focus in working for gay, lesbian, bisexual & transgender affirmation within the Anglican Communion.[106] such as gay Anglicans in Nigeria.

Sociologist Richard N. Pitt argues that these organizations are only available to LGBT members of liberal denominations, as opposed to those in conservative denominations. His review of the literature on gay Christians suggests that these organizations not only represent the interests of Christians who attend their churches, but (like gay-friendly and gay-affirming churches) also give these members useful responses to homophobic and heterosexist rhetoric. His research shows that those GLBT Christians who stay at homophobic churches "kill the messenger"[107] by attacking the minister's knowledge about homosexuality, personal morality, focus on sin instead of forgiveness, and motivations for preaching against homosexuality.

See also[edit]





  • Stephen Mattson, (17 June 2014). "10 Ways Christians Misuse Faith", Relevant magazine[1].
  • Bates, Stephen (2004). A Church at War: Anglicans and Homosexuality. I.B. Tauris. ISBN 1-85043-480-8.
  • Boswell, John (1980). Christianity, social tolerance, and homosexuality: Gay people in Western Europe from the beginning of the Christian era to the fourteenth century. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-06710-6
  • Boswell, John (1979). The Church & the Homosexual
  • Crompton, Louis, et al., (2003). Homosexuality and Civilization Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-01197-X
  • Dag Øistein Endsjø (2011). Sex and Religion. Teachings and Taboos in the History of World Faiths. Reaktion Books.
  • Gagnon, Robert A.J. (2002). The Bible and Homosexual Practice: Texts and Hermeneutics. Abingdon Press. ISBN 0-687-02279-7
  • Harvey, John F., O.S.F.S. (1996). The Truth about Homosexuality: The Cry of the Faithful, introduction by Benedict J. Groeschel, C.F.R.. Ignatius Press. ISBN 0-89870-583-5.
  • Helminiak, Daniel A. (2000). "Frequently Asked Questions About Being Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, or Transgender and Catholic" Dignity USA.
  • Hildegard of Bingen (c. 1142). "Scivias," Columba Hart and Jane Bishop, translators; New York: Paulist Press, 1990
  • Johansson, Warren (1992). "Whosoever Shall Say To His Brother, Racha." Studies in Homosexuality, Vol XII: Homosexuality and Religion and Philosophy. Ed. Wayne Dynes & Stephen Donaldson. New York & London: Garland, pp. 212–214
  • Mader, Donald (1992). "The Entimos Pais of Matthew 8:5–13 and Luke 7:1–10" Studies in Homosexuality, Vol XII: Homosexuality and Religion and Philosophy. Ed. Wayne Dynes & Stephen Donaldson. New York & London: Garland, pp. 223–235.
  • Saletan, William (29 November 2005). "Gland Inquisitor". Slate.
  • Smith, Morton (1992). "Clement of Alexandria and Secret Mark: The Score at the End of the First Decade." Studies in Homosexuality, Vol XII: Homosexuality and Religion and Philosophy. Ed. Wayne Dynes & Stephen Donaldson. New York & London: Garland, pp. 295–307

Template:Christianity footer


  1. Mark Allan Powell, HarperCollins Bible Dictionary (HarperCollins 2011 ISBN 978-0-06207859-9), entry "homosexuality"
  2. Religion Dispatches magazine, Candace Chellew-Hodge
  3. On Marriage, Family, Sexuality, and the Sanctity of Life
  4. M. Mikhail, "The Coptic Orthodox Church's View on Homosexuality"
  5. Template:Cite web
  6. Template:Cite web
  7. Template:Cite web
  8. Template:Cite web
  9. Template:Cite web
  10. Template:Cite web
  11. Evangelical Alliance (UK): Faith, Hope and HomosexualityTemplate:Dead link
  12. Template:Cite web
  13. Template:Cite web
  14. Template:Cite web
  15. Template:Cite web
  16. Template:Cite web
  17. Template:Cite web
  18. Template:Cite web
  19. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2357–2359
  20. 20.0 20.1 Criteria for the Discernment of Vocation for Persons with Homosexual Tendencies, 2
  21. Catechism of the Catholic Church, § 2357; cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2351, 2391, 2396
  22. Template:Cite book
  23. Orthodox Church in AmericaTemplate:Dead link
  24. Template:Cite web
  25. Template:Cite web
  26. "United Church of Christ Backs Same-Sex Marriage"
  27. Template:Cite web
  28. Template:Cite web
  29. Template:Cite web
  30. 30.0 30.1 Template:Cite web
  31. Template:Cite web
  32. Template:Cite web
  33. Template:Cite web
  34. Template:Cite news
  35. Template:Cite web
  36. Template:Cite news
  37. Template:Cite web
  38. Template:Citation
  39. Chronology of Marriage and Equality Rights in the United ChurchTemplate:Dead link
  40. "Same-Sex Marriage Legislation Offers a Win-Win Solution, Says The United Church of Canada," 2005-FEB-01, United Church of Canada, at:
  41. Template:Cite web
  42. Template:Cite web
  43. U.S. Religious landscape survey, 2008 The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life
  44. Social Issues: Marriage and FamilyTemplate:Dead link
  46. Template:Cite book
  47. 47.0 47.1 Template:Cite book
  48. Template:Cite book
  49. Template:Cite web
  50. Template:Cite news
  51. 51.0 51.1 51.2
  52. Template:Cite web
  53. Template:Cite web
  54. Template:Cite web
  55. Template:Cite book
  57. [2]Template:Dead link
  58. [3]Template:Dead link
  59. Template:Cite web
  60. "Catechism of the Catholic Church", see the "Chastity and homosexuality" section.
  61. Template:Cite web
  62. Instruction Concerning the Criteria for the Discernment of Vocations with regard to Persons with Homosexual Tendencies in view of their Admission to the Seminary and to Holy Orders, Congregation for Catholic Education, 4 November 2005
  63. Template:Cite news
  64. Template:Cite web
  65. WELS Topical Q&A: Christian Living - Human Behavior: Sexual Behavior
  66. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named welsstatement
  67. The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration, by Bruce M. Metzger
  68. Template:Cite book
  69. Template:Cite web
  70. Template:Cite web
  71. Template:Cite news
  72. See generally and subpages therein.
  73. Template:Cite web
  74. Template:Cite web
  75. 75.0 75.1 75.2 Template:Cite web
  76. 76.0 76.1 76.2
  77. 77.0 77.1 77.2 Template:Cite book
  78. 78.0 78.1 Template:Citation
  79. Template:Cite web
  80. Robin Darling Young, "Gay Marriage: Reimagining Church History", First Things 47 (November 1994), pp. 43–48.
  81. 81.0 81.1 Paul Halsall, Reviewing Boswell (1995).
  82. John Boswell, The Church and the Homosexual – An Historical Perspective (1979).
  83. Template:Cite web
  84. Sex, Love & Homophobia, published by Amnesty International UK, 2005, foreword by Desmund Tutu.
  85. Template:Cite web
  86. Template:Cite web
  87. Quoted in Chellew-Hodge, Candace. "New Poll Shows Gays and Lesbians Believe in God." ReligionDispatches. 25 June 2009. . Retrieved 2009-06-27.
  88. 88.0 88.1 Template:Cite web
  89. 89.0 89.1 Template:Cite web
  90. GCN Homepage (website). Gay Christian Network. Retrieved 2008-03-05.
  91. Template:Cite news
  92. Transcript of 18 December 2006 episode of Anderson Cooper 360
  93. Template:Cite web
  94. Template:Cite web
  95. Template:Cite news
  96. Template:Cite web
  97. Template:Cite web
  98. Template:Cite web
  101. European Forum of LGBT Christian GroupsTemplate:Dead link
  102. Template:Cite web
  103. Template:Cite web
  104. Template:Cite web
  105. Changing Attitude (UK)
  106. Template:Cite web
  107. Template:Cite web