From S'pore LGBT encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

K Shanmugam is a politician and lawyer who is a member of the People's Action Party (PAP). He has been the Minister for Law since May 2008 and the Minister for Home Affairs since October 2015.

Shanmugam has commented publicly several times on LGBT rights in Singapore and also agreed to meetings with both pro- and anti-LGBT equality activists where he has listened intently to their viewpoints but endeavoured to maintain a neutral stance.

Comments on Section 377A of the Penal Code[edit]

In 2009[edit]

On Thursday, 2 July 2009, a New Delhi high court issued a landmark ruling which overturned Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, a 150-year-old British colonial era law criminalising homosexuality (see video:[1]). 3 days later, on Sunday, 5 July 2009, Minister of Law K Shanmugam was asked by female grassroots leader Khartini Abdul Khalid during a dialogue session at Punggol Central Division whether it was time for Singapore, whose laws were "copied" from India by the British colonialists, to repeal Section 377A of the Singapore Penal Code. Shanmugam replied "no" because Singapore society was "not ready" for that[2].

He said that while the Government had to "set the standards" on many issues, it must "be careful about being ahead of public opinion. If the majority of our population is against homosexuality, then it's not for the Government to say we are going to force something against the wishes of the people"[3], reiterating the Government's stance when a motion to repeal Section 377A was intensely debated in Parliament in 2007.

Shanmugam explained that India's laws on homosexuality had not changed. "It is a court-interpreted decision. It wasn't a change of the law by the government." Instead, it was the New Delhi High Court's interpretation that "with the current evidence available and the current social situations in many parts of the world ... you can no longer consider homosexuality to be a wrongful sexual activity." He stressed that Singapore's courts were likewise free to interpret the law the same way. "Whether the courts will take the same interpretations, I don't know, but it's up to the courts."

Singapore had not repealed Section 377A despite appeals from some quarters to do so as the Government "cannot move ahead of public opinion". This was because while the Government has to "set the standard and take the lead" in many other areas, there remain areas where it has to "be careful of being ahead of public opinion."

Sexuality and personal issues were some areas where the Government preferred to defer to public opinion. He said, "There is a group that is actively committed to saying that homosexuality is okay, but probably a majority of Singaporeans are still very conservative and say that this is totally not acceptable. So, the Government has to respect both sides."

He conceded that the current situation, in which the law against homosexuality is in place but is not strictly enforced, "is a little bit messy"[4]. "We have to accept a bit of messiness. The way society is going, we don't think it will be fair to prosecute people who say that they are homosexuals. But at this time, our society is not ready for us to say we will pass legislations which say homosexuality is no longer an offence."

In 2014[edit]

In June 2014, when asked by Bloomberg News about the Section 377A constitutional challenge and its background, Shanmugam replied “The majority of the population still favours the current legal framework,” [5]. He added that while society was evolving and social mores were changing, “the government has taken the position that this is a situation where it is best to agree to disagree.”

Meeting with Sayoni[edit]

On 6 October 2012, Jean Chong of Sayoni, frustrated with the state of institutionalised discrimination against LGBT persons in Singapore, left a note on the Facebook page of K Shanmugam, then Minister of Law and Foreign Affairs[6]. Chong wrote of friends leaving and the National Conversation making no effort to acknowledge that LGBT people were Singaporeans too. She highlighted Sayoni's trip to the United Nations in 2011 to present its shadow report detailing the kind of discrimination that the government so often denied. She said that if LGBT citizens were not wanted, please tell them, so that they could all forget the struggle and move on to wherever they needed to be.

Shanmugam replied, “There can be no suggestion that LGBT citizens are not wanted. The bigger question is, with the diverse viewpoints in our society and often held strongly by various groups, the government is often caught in the middle trying to decide what would be acceptable to the majority." He further agreed to a meeting with representatives from Sayoni which took place on 27 November 2012.

On 4 January 2013, Shanmugam posted a short note on Facebook about the meeting[7]:

"I recently met up with some activists from Sayoni a Singapore-based platform for lesbian, bisexual and transsexual Asian women. I found the discussion useful. They posted a description of our meeting on their blog."

Meeting with Full Gospel Business Singapore[edit]

On Thursday, 24 January 2013, The Straits Times reported that Shanmugam had received more than 50 e-mails on homosexuality since he disclosed 3 weeks prior that he had had a meeting with gay activists from Sayoni[8]. These e-mails were on top of almost 1,500 online comments left on 3 of his Facebook posts. However, he did not reveal the content of the e-mails. Shanmugam said that on Tuesday, 22 January 2013, he had met 14 members of a Christian group - Full Gospel Business Singapore (FGBS) - and a few other individuals but declined to disclose what was discussed[9],[10].

FGBS, an inter-denominational group of Christian professionals, posted a report about the meeting on its Facebook page and Shanmugam wrote a message containing a copy of the report on his page on the night of Wednesday, 23 January 2013[11]:

"I had earlier said that yesterday I met with a group of people from a Church group and some others who had wanted to meet me to discuss LGBT issues. The group ( Full Gospel Business Singapore) has put up a post on its FB on the meeting.

Here is the post that they forwarded to me:

"A 14-member delegation led by the President of Full Gospel Business Singapore (FGBS) met with Mr. K Shanmugam, Minister for Law and Minister for Foreign Affairs on 22 Jan. The feedback is as given below:

1. We had a positive, lively and at times, spirited discussion.

2. Minister shared his views in a very candid manner. He came across as sincere and open and spoke from his heart.

3. We welcomed and accepted the Minister's suggestion for a continuing dialogue so that we can all help make Singapore become a better place for all.

4. We thank the Minister for his warmth and friendly conversation with us.

5. One of those present commented: "The Minister's approach is very refreshing. He is very open, listens carefully, and engages deeply. It was an excellent dialogue."

Meeting with LoveSingapore[edit]

On Friday, 15 February 2013, Shanmugam met with the leaders of LoveSingapore, a network of 100 churches, to discuss views on the gay community[12]. In a Facebook post the following Monday, 18 February 2013, Shanmugam said that Faith Community Baptist Church pastor Lawrence Khong had asked to meet him, following Shanmugam's meeting with lesbian group Sayoni. He said he met with Khong, who headed LoveSingapore, as well as other pastors like Yang Tuck Yoong of Cornerstone Community Church and provided a link to a statement written by Khong on the LoveSingapore Facebook page[13],[14],[15]:

"15th February 2013 was Total Defence Day. Interestingly, in the afternoon of that same day, our LoveSingapore Team met with Mr K Shanmugam, Minister for Law and Minister for Foreign Affairs to talk about defending the moral future of our nation! It's our first time meeting the Minister in person. Often first impressions are lasting impressions. We came away inspired. Here is a man in high office and he has no airs! The Minister is a very good listener. His personable style sets the ambience for respectful dialogue. And so, YES, we enjoyed our conversation with the Minister on a hot and emotional topic - the LGBT issue - looking at it through different lenses and from many angles. He explained the multiple viewpoints on the topic, his engagement with many different groups, and how their viewpoints differed. In response to our query, the Minister stated that the position of the government on S377A is as set out by the Prime Minister in Parliament in 2007."

Meeting with Oogachaga[edit]

On 17 February 2015, Shanmugam had a discussion with two staff members from Oogachaga and penned the following message on Facebook[16]:

"Met with Bryan Choong and Leow Yangfa yesterday. Both work for Oogachaga Counselling and Support. This is a non-profit organisation which offers counselling and personal development for LGBTQ individuals. They spoke about discrimination against persons from the LGBT community, and in particular transgender persons. They also spoke about the bullying that goes on in schools. They also discussed some ideas on how such discrimination can be reduced, and society be made more tolerant."

Statements in aftermath of Orlando shooting[edit]

In the aftermath of a massacre at a gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida, on Sunday, 12 June 2016, when a lone attacker called Omar Mateen gunned down some 50 people in the deadliest mass shooting in American history, Shanmugam posted the following message on Facebook on the night of Tuesday, 14 June 2016[17]:

"Orlando Shooting

This evening, I joined the Iftar at Khadijah Mosque.

I was asked by the media about the Orlando shooting incident. I said: The motives of the gunman are not yet clear. Investigations are continuing. But it looks like the gay community has been targeted. This is unacceptable. Violence against any group and any form is not acceptable. Here, the Government will act decisively, if there is threat or violence against anyone or any group.

The Government's duty is to protect everyone. Their race, their religion, their sexual orientation - these are not relevant in terms of the Government’s duty to protect. We have a duty to protect everyone. And I think in this incident, (it) again highlights the threat of terror, whether it's targeted at religious groups or whether it's targeted at specific people, individuals. And we, as Singaporeans, have to come together, unite together to fight this terror.

The Iftar was organised by the Religious Rehabilitation Group (RRG).

Home Team News (Singapore)"

Earlier that evening on 14 June 2016, Shanmugam also responded to reporters' queries on the incident and on terrorism:

See also[edit]


  • Sue-Ann Chia, "Homosexual acts: No change in actual Indian law", The Straits Times, 6 July 2009[18].
  • "S'pore not swayed by India's gay sex ruling: minister", Asia One, 6 July 2009[19].
  • Teo Xuanwei, "Law Minister says Govt careful of being ahead of public opinion", TODAY, 6 July 2009[20].
  • Indulekshmi Rajeswari, "Singapore says no. And maybe", Sayoni, 8 July 2009[21].
  • Andrew Loh, "Cheering bigotry in the House", Public House, 12 April 2013[22].
  • Tessa Wong, "Law Minister, MPs receive e-mails on gay issues", The Straits Times, 24 January 2013[23].
  • Ian Poh, "Law minister has 'frank discussion' on LGBT issues", The Straits Times, 23 January 2013[24].
  • Tessa Wong, "Shanmugam meets LoveSingapore pastors to discuss gay issue", The Straits Times, 18 February 2013[25].
  • Tessa Wong, "Minister to meet church group over gay issues", The Straits Times, 19 January 2014[26].
  • Andrea Tan, "Singapore Top Court Tackles Challenge to 1938 Gay-Sex Ban", Bloomberg, 14 July 2014[27].
  • Nur Asyiqin Mohamad Salleh, "Shanmugam meets counsellors who offer support to gay community", Singapolitics, 17 February 2015[28].
  • Tessa Wong, "Law Minister meets church leaders over gay issues", The Straits Times, 19 February 2013[29].
  • Audrey Tan, "Government will protect people regardless of race, religion or sexuality: Shanmugam", The Straits Times, 14 June 2016[30].


This article was written by Roy Tan.